tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8434050931789572015.post2799382880759947587..comments2023-08-30T22:42:22.226-04:00Comments on DirkMD - CMIO Perspective: Signal-to-noise ratioDirk Stanley, MD, MPHhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09568427937893548660noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8434050931789572015.post-49788790237149435822009-11-12T00:35:14.297-05:002009-11-12T00:35:14.297-05:00I hear you loud and clear. I think it really speak...I hear you loud and clear. I think it really speaks to change management. If a system considers itself to be in constant flux, it will feel the need to communicate changes and instabilities to all members very frequently. (we are changing this today, and tomorrow we will be using form X, the day after we will trial process z etc...) A well planed system, I think, knows how to meter and dose change. In this way the frequency of needing-to-distribute-information is reduced. The less communication the more valued those communications become: Change and communication of that change on a predictable and metered cycle. (also, could you put perma-links for each post? :-) )M.Shellenbergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09232374901746250810noreply@blogger.com